The diagnostic
Score each statement 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Add them up at the end.
Clarity
- Every member of my leadership team can state our top three strategic priorities for this quarter without checking a document.
- Every priority has a single named owner — not a committee.
- We've explicitly de-prioritized at least two things this quarter (a strategy of yes-to-everything is no strategy).
Translation
- Each strategic priority cascades to weekly objectives for at least one team.
- Frontline staff can articulate how this week's work ladders up to a strategic goal.
- We've designed the systems (data, tools, rituals) the strategy requires — not retrofitted strategy onto current systems.
Rhythm
- We hold a 30-minute weekly review focused on the top priorities — not status theatre.
- We hold a quarterly review where priorities can be killed, re-cast, or upgraded.
- Decisions made in reviews are written down within 24 hours and broadcast.
Honesty
- When a priority is off-track, the named owner says so in the meeting — without political damage.
- We have a way to flag bad strategy, not just bad execution.
- We've killed at least one priority mid-quarter in the last year because evidence said so.
Scoring
- 50–60: You don't have an execution gap. You have a scaling problem. Different conversation.
- 35–49: The gap is in rhythm and translation. Install weekly reviews; reduce priority count.
- 20–34: The gap is structural. Strategy is decoration. Start by naming three priorities, single owners, two-week sprints.
- Under 20: Strategy isn't your problem yet — survival is. Get to next month, then redesign.
What we do with the score
In engagements, we use this as the first diagnostic in week one. The score is the baseline. Three months later we re-score with the leadership team. The lift is the engagement KPI.